has issued notice to prove his title in respect of the said land and the case was ordered in the absence of the respondent directing the Tahsildar to set aside the Mutation vide MR No.103/2006-07, dated: 6/9/2006, existing in the name of the respondent and to enter the name of the Government in the revenue records; that the respondent aggrieved by the said order of the then Special Deputy Commissioner had approached the Hon'ble High Court and the Hon'ble High Court had quashed the said order and remanded the matter to this court for fresh disposal; that the land was originally Government land and granted to one Shri Munishamappa and to that effect the saguvali chit was issued by the Tahsildar in favour of the grantee, who is the father of the present respondent; that ever since the grant the said Shri Munishamappa was in possession of the said land and the revenue records/RTC stood in his favour; that after the demise of the said grantee, the respondent and his brother, namely Shri Mopirappa, being the legal heirs of the grantee have got partitioned the subject land and accordingly the land measuring 2 Acres of the said Sy.No. fell to the share of the respondent and to that effect the mutation vide NMR. No.55/2009-10 had been effected in the name of the respondent, that ever since the partition, the respondent is in continuous possession and enjoyment of the land and the name of the respondent was entered in col.9 of the RTC and, hence, he is the absolute owner in possession and enjoyment; that on 16/6/2009, the said Sy.No. 46/3-P1 has been phoded wherein the said Sy.No. has been re-numbered as Sy.No.266 and the name of the grantee, the name of the
