Two suspended BBMP Senior Health Inspectors sought quashing of a suspension order. Counsel submitted the petition had become infructuous and the High Court dismissed it as infructuous without adjudicating the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:838 WP No. 20282 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 20282 OF 2019 (S-RES)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by V KRISHNA Location: High Court of Karnataka
…PETITIONERS
(BY MS. GOWTHAMI V, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SRINIVAS V, ADVOCATE)
AND:
NC: 2024:KHC:838 WP No. 20282 of 2019
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. S.H. PRASHANTH CHANDRA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE SUSPENSION ORDER DATED 05.12.2018 ISSUED BY THE R-1 VIDE ANENXURE-A TO THE WRIT PETITION AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
petition has become infructuous.
become infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
HDK
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21 CT: BHK
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the suspension order dated 05.12.2018 against the petitioners could be quashed; the court did not decide this as the petition was conceded infructuous.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
C.O. Jagadish
Jayakumar
The Commissioner, BBMP
The Deputy Commissioner (Admin), BBMP
Sachin Shankar Magadum
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
