Disposed

Amir Hamza v. Suleman S/O Bandagisab Nidagundi

Karnataka HC11 Nov 2024WP/202728/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A judicial officer challenged a transfer order passed by the High Court's Registrar. Considering the officer's contentions, the court directed that pending matters be dealt with appropriately and disposed of the writ petition with liberty to seek further relief.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of with directions regarding pending cases; liberty granted to approach for further orders.

Amir Hamza Vs Suleman S/O Bandagisab Nidagundi — Service and Employment | Karnataka HC (2024)

��

��

��

�� !!^�� "��#�$��

��

��%��$��&� �� $��

��'�$��(

��

��

�� !"!�

#��

$��%�

��

Digitally signed by SUMITRA SHERIGAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

��

�� !�� &�� '!'�

#��

$��(��%�

��(��'')��(�� (��%�� (��&�� *��! �!'�'"'!��

��

�� + �'"!��+)�'"!��

��(��(�� ,� ��,� ��-��

¶25

��

¶26

$��,��-��%

¶27

!�� ./0�123/3/45�67�3.2�189/53/::�/5��4�)!+�'"!)� 45�3.2�:/82�4:�3.2��;;/3/4598��/</8��=;>2�/5��(��/?9791=@�� /0�;/@2A32;�9>9/503�3.2�/B1=>52;�4@;2@�;932;�')�"��'"!�� C.2@267��3.2�3@/98��4=@3�>@9532;�32B14@9@7�/5?=5A3/45�/5� :9<4@�4:�3.2�123/3/452@�189/53/::�C./A.�C90�@2<2@02;�67�3.2� :/@03��11288932��4=@3�/5��4�+ �'"!��95;��4�+)�'"!�� C./A.�C2@2�9884C2;�67�3.2�:/@03��11288932��4=@3�C/3.�9� /B1=>52;�4@;2@�;932;�! �!'�'"'!��

¶28

'�� .4=>.�02<2@98�A453253/450�.9<2�6225�=@>2;�67� 643.�0/;20�/5�0=114@3�4:�3.2/@�@2012A3/<2�A89/B0��/3�/0�95� =5;/01=32;�:9A3�95;�9�B9332@�4:�@2A4@;�3.93�3.2@2�/0�9�0=/3�/5� ��4�)!+�'"!)�125;/5>�623C225�3.2�123/3/452@�95;�3.2� @20145;2530�<25;4@��@/��=009/5096�C./A.�/0�1@2025387�

¶29

��

¶30

¶31

125;/5>�62:4@2�3.2��;;/3/4598��25/4@��/</8��=;>2�95;�� 4=@3��/?9791=@9��

¶32

+�� 5;2@�3.202�A/@A=B0395A20��C/3.4=3�2D1@200/5>�

¶33

957�41/5/45�45�3.2�B2@/3�;2B2@/30�4:�3.2�@/<98�A453253/450�� ;22B�/3�?=03�95;�911@41@/932�34�2D2@A/02�B7�14C2@0�=5;2@� �@3/A82�'')�4:�3.2��4503/3=3/45�4:��5;/9�@29;�C/3.��2A3/45�'�� 4:��95;�C/3.;@9C��4�)!+�'"!)�:@4B�3.2�:/82�4:�3.2�� ;;/3/4598��/</8��=;>2��/?9791=@9�95;�3@950:2@�3.2�09/;�0=/3� 34�3.2�A4=@3�4:�3.2��;;/3/4598��/</8��=;>2�95;��(�� /?9791=@�34�62�A8=662;��A45048/;932;��3@/2;�95;�;/01402;�4:� 9845>�C/3.��4�!"E�'""E�/5�9AA4@;95A2�C/3.�89C��

¶34

�� AA4@;/5>87��1900�3.2�:4884C/5>,�

¶35

��

¶36

$/% �.2�C@/3�123/3/45�/0�;/01402;�4:F�

¶37

$//% �.2�/B1=>52;�4@;2@0�;932;�')�"��'"!��95;� ! �!'�'"'!�9@2�.2@267�B4;/:/2;F��

¶38

$///% ��4�)!+�'"!)�125;/5>�45�3.2�:/82�4:�3.2� 3@/98� A4=@3� $�� ;;/3/4598� �/</8� �=;>2��

¶39

��

¶40

¶41

�/?9791=@9%�/0�;/@2A32;�34�62�C/3.;@9C5�:@4B�

¶42

3.2�09/;�A4=@3�95;�3@950:2@@2;�34�3.2�A4=@3�4:� 3.2��;;/3/4598��25/4@��/</8��=;>2�95;�� 93��/?9791=@9�34�62�A8=662;��A45048/;932;�95;� ;/01402;�4::�34>23.2@�C/3.��4�!"E�'""E� 95;�/5�9AA4@;95A2�C/3.�89C��

¶43

$/<% �88�@/<98�A453253/450�67�643.�3.2�19@3/20�/5� 643.�3.2�0=/30�9@2�G213�4125�95;�54�41/5/45� /0�2D1@2002;�45�3.2�09B2F�

¶44

$<% �3�/0�:[email protected]@�;/@2A32;�3.93�3/88�;/014098�4:�643.� 3.2�0=/30��988�19@3/20�9@2�;/@2A32;�34�B9/539/5� 0393=0�H=4�/5�988�@2012A30�90�45�34;97�/5� @2893/45�34�3.2�0=/3�0A.2;=82�1@412@3/20��

)*��

' �� $��(� &��

��

�/03��4�,�!��8��4�,�"�

Amir Hamza v. Suleman S/O Bandagisab Nidagundi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amir Hamza v. Suleman S/O Bandagisab Nidagundi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Case details

Similar cases

Shekappa @ Chandrashekhar S/O Bapu Kali Vs Gangabai W/O Basavaraj Chalagetri and Ors.

Mumthaz P Vs Board of Directors of

Sri H Srinivas Vs Vishwabharathi House Co. Operative Society

The United India Insurance Company Limited Vs Basangouda @ Basavaraj and Ors.

Mohd.Hussain Siddiqui and Anr. Vs the State of Karnataka and Ors.

Avinash Vs the State of Karnataka and Ors.