High Court dismissed Writ Petition No. 202176 of 2023 seeking mandamus to consider panchayat membership representation and disqualification for non-prosecution, noting petitioner's absence after Order dated 19.08.2024 indicating lack of interest.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution due to petitioner's failure to appear and lack of interest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO.202176 OF 2023 (LB-RES)
BETWEEN:
CHARLI S/O BALASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCCUPATION MEMBER OF UTAKNOOR GRAM PANCHAYAT,TALUK MANVI, DISTRICT RAICHUR-584123.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. GURUBASAVA BASANNA,ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by BASALINGAPPA SHIVARAJ DHUTTARGAON Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SHIVAKUMAR R. TENGLI, ADV FOR R1, R3 TO R6; SRI. AMARESH S. ROJA, ADVOCATE FOR F2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO A) ISSUE WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR DIRECTION TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF PETITIONER AS PER ANNEXURE L AND ANNEXURE L1. AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)
“a) Issue writ of mandamus or direction to consider the representation of petitioner as per annexure-L and annexure-L1.
b) Issue writ of prohibitory orders as against the respondent No.10 from filing the nomination for the second term election for the post of president and vice president of Utaknoor Gram Panchayat as per AnnexureK.
c) issue writ of mandamus or directions or orders to the respondent no 3 to disqualify the membership of respondent no 10 as per annexure- H.
d) Issue any other directions or orders the honourable high court deems fit under the facts and circumstances of the case”.
Sd/(SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
AMM
List No.: 2 Sl No.: 12
2 issues framed by the court
Whether writ petition should be dismissed for non-prosecution when petitioner fails to appear after prior order.
Whether directions can be issued to consider representation for panchayat membership and disqualify respondent No. 10.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Charli S/O Balaswamy
The Secretary Panchayat Raj Government of Karnataka
Eramma W/O Amarappa
Suraj Govindaraj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
