A writ petition challenging a Tribunal order allowing an impleading application in an appeal was disposed of after respondent 3's counsel filed a memo stating the underlying appeal had been dismissed and the petition did not survive. The High Court disposed of the petition as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024 BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO.1871 OF 2022 (LB-BMP)
BETWEEN:
SMT.H.V.VEENA W/O.T.H.SHANKARAIAH AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS OCCUPATION: HOUSEWIFE R/AT NO.238/239 VINAYAKA LAYOUT SRI M.V.LAYOUT, 3RD BLOCK BENGALURU-560 056
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI K.N.PRAKASH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE N.R.SQUARE HUDSON CIRCLE BENGALURU-560 002
Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI PAWAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-1 & R-2; SRI PRASANNA V.R., ADVOCATE FOR R-3)
NC: 2024:KHC:51687 WP No. 1871 of 2022
THIS WRIT PETITON IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 24.11.2021 PASSED ON IA.NO.IV IN APPEAL NO.779/2018 (CH-I) BY THE KARNATAKA APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU ALLOWING THE IMPLEADING APPLICATION FILED BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT UNDER REGULATION 40(a) OF THE KARNATAKA APPELLATE TRIBUNAL REGULATIONS, 1979 READ WITH ORDER I RULE 10(2) AND SECTION 151 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 VIDE ANNEXURE-A.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD
ORAL ORDER
Sri Prasanna V.R., the learned counsel for respondent
No.3, has filed a memo stating that the petition does not survive because Appeal No.779/2018 has been dismissed by the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal and that this petition is against the interim order in such appeal.
In the light of the afore, the petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous.
SD/(B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE
LB
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21
Smt. H.V. Veena
The Commissioner, Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike
The Assistant Executive Engineer, Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike, Kengeri Sub Division
Sri Nagaraja A.V.
B M SHYAM PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
