Dismissed

Sri Shambulingaiah v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC6 Aug 2024WP/18565/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition challenging a Government Order and an FIR registered by the Anti-Corruption Bureau. The Government Order had already been struck down by a co-ordinate bench; the petitioner sought leave to withdraw the petition regarding remaining prayers, which was permitted.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh challenging the FIR without prejudice.

Sri Shambulingaiah Vs the State of Karnataka — Corruption | Karnataka HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2024:KHC:31759-DB WP No. 18565 of 2017

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 6^TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2024

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN

¶7

AND

¶8

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA

¶9

WRIT PETITION NO. 18565 OF 2017 (GM-RES)

¶10

BETWEEN:

¶11

SRI. SHAMBULINGAIAH S/O LATE MADAIAH AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER MANCHANAYAKANAHALLI GRAMA PANCHAYATH BIDADI HOBLI, RAMANAGARA TALUK R/AT. CHAMUNDESHWARI NAGARA 10^TH CROSS, BESIDE CHANNEL MANDYA TOWN-562 159

¶12

…PETITIONER

¶13

(BY SRI. PREMA KUMAR A.L., ADVOCATE)

¶14

AND:

¶15

Digitally signed by CHANNEGOWDA PREMA Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶16

1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

¶17

ANTI-CORRUPTION BUREAU RAMANAGARA DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY SPECIAL P.P. M.S. BUILDING

¶18

BENGALURU-560 001

¶19

2 . SRI. M. MANISH

¶20

S/O MUNISWAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/AT SHESHAGIRIHALLI COLONY HEEJALA POST, BIDADI HOBLI RAMANAGARA TALUK-562 109

¶21

…RESPONDENTS

¶22

¶23

NC: 2024:KHC:31759-DB WP No. 18565 of 2017

¶24

(BY SRI. B.B. PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. AKKIMANJUNATH GOWDA K., ADVOCATE FOR R2)

¶25

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT OF CERTIORARI BY QUASHING THE FIR DATED 13.03.2017 IN Cr.No.4/2017 REGISTERED BY ANTI-CORRUPTION BUREAU, RAMANAGAR VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.

¶26

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶27

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA

¶28

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶29

(PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN)

¶30

It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for

¶31

the writ petitioner that the petitioner had challenged the

¶32

Government Order and FIR in the writ petition.

¶33

It is submitted that as far as Government Order is

¶34

concerned, the same has already been struck down by a

¶35

Co-Ordinate Bench of this Court. With regard to other

¶36

prayers, the petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw the writ

¶37

¶38

NC: 2024:KHC:31759-DB WP No. 18565 of 2017

¶39

petition without prejudice to his right to agitate the matter

¶40

afresh, if the lis survives.

¶41

In the above view of the matter, the submission

¶42

made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is accepted.

¶43

The petitioner is permitted to withdraw the writ petition without prejudice to his right to file afresh challenging the FIR, in case the lis survives. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn .

¶44

Sd/(ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE

¶45

Sd/(G BASAVARAJA) JUDGE

¶46

MH/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 0

Sri Shambulingaiah v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Shambulingaiah v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri. Govindaraju C K Vs the State of Karnataka

Smt. Vasantha. a Vs State of Karnataka

The Karnataka Lokayukta Vs Smt Gayathri

The State of Karnataka Vs N Suma

Block Education Officer Vs Sri Ravindra Jokanahalli

Sri N Raghumurthy Vs the State of Karnataka