Writ petition by the provident fund authority against an employer was dismissed for non-prosecution after no representation on two consecutive listings; the petitioner appeared not interested in pursuing the matter.
None granted; writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:27034 WP No. 17499 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JULY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 17499 OF 2015 (L-PF)
BETWEEN:
CENTRAL BOARD OF TRUSTEES, REPRESENTED BY ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION, SUB-REGIONAL OFFICE, NO.109-128, GAYATHRIPURAM II STAGE, MYSORE-570 019.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. M.PRADEEP., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka
SREE GANESH GEARS PRIVATE LIMITED, PLOT NO.106, BELAGOLA INDUSTRIAL AREA, MYSORE-560 016. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR.
(BY SRI. SOMASHEKAR., ADVOCATE)
…RESPONDENT
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
NC: 2024:KHC:27034 WP No. 17499 of 2015
ORDER
When the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing.
As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 03.07.2024, on that day, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. Hence, the office was directed to list the matter under the caption 'for dismissal' on 12.07.2024.
The petition is listed today under the caption 'for dismissal'. As already noted above, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39
Sd/JUDGE
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Central Board of Trustees, represented by Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organization, Sub-Regional Office, Mysore
Sree Ganesh Gears Private Limited, represented by its Chairman and Managing Director
Jyoti Mulimani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
