Petitioner sought to quash a revenue order and stay its operation. The court held the petition was infructuous as the impugned order had already been implemented, and dismissed the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 16213 OF 2017 (LB-BMP)
BETWEEN:
YESHODAMMA W/O. RAMASWAMY SHETTY AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS #104/1, VAKKALIGARA BEEDHI NEAR YELAHANKA CIRCLE HENNUR NORTH TALUK BENGALURU-560 064.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. D KUMAR RAJU.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
NC: 2024:KHC:21007 WP No. 16213 of 2017
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.K V MOHAN KUMAR .,ADVOCATE FOR FR TO R5)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTICE DATED:31.12.2016 ORDER PASSED BY THE R-5 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND GRANT AN INTERIM ORDER TO STAY THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED:31.12.2016 PASSED BY THE R-5 VIDE ANNEXURE-A.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
submits that the impugned order has already been implemented. Therefore, the writ petition does not survive for consideration.
NC: 2024:KHC:21007 WP No. 16213 of 2017
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having
become infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
DM
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 46
YESHODAMMA W/O. RAMASWAMY SHETTY
THE COMMISSIONER B.B.M.P.
THE JOINT COMMISSIONER B.B.M.P.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER B.B.M.P.
THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER B.B.M.P.
THE ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER B.B.M.P.
H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
