A writ petition challenging a judicial magistrate's order concerning a scheduled property in a banking dispute was disposed of after the parties reported that the matter had been settled out of court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:25171 WP No. 145 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JULY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 145 OF 2023 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
KANAKAPURA TALUK, RAMANAGAR – 562 117.
Digitally signed by Vandana S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. SANDHYA U PRABHU, ADVOCATE)
AND:
M/S HDFC BANK LIMITED REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER/MANAGER
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE REGD. UNDER BANKING COMPANIES ACT, HDFC BANK HOUSE, SENAPATI BAPAT MARG, LOWER PAREL, MUMBAI MAHARASTRA – 400 013. BRANCH OFFICE NO. 103/31 26TH MAIN ROAD, 4TH T BLOCK, NEAR R V COLLEGE JAYANAGARA, BENGALURU- 560 041
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. SURESH V., ADVOCATE)
THIS WP FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE AT RAMANAGAR IN CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS NO.80/2022 DATED 27.12.2022 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-C, IN RESPECT OF SCHEDULE PROPERTY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for both parties submits that the matter is
settled out of Court.
disposed of as having settled out of Court.
BMC: List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35
Sd/JUDGE
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri K R Diwakar
Sri Kumar K M
Mrs Premakumar
Sri Shivaramu K B
M/S HDFC Bank Limited
S.R. Krishna Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
