application Under order VII rule 11(d) of CPC, after dismissal of that application, the defendant come up with this application for amend the written statement for insert the Para No.22(a) to 22(I), perused the same he stated the legality of the establishment of the Plaintiff’s school committee and also election and regulations passed by the committee and also writ petition filed before the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka, but in this case issue involved only whether there is a landlord tenant relationship between the parties and tenancy is legally terminated or not. In this suit this court has no power to ascertain whether the Plaintiff’s school committee formed legally or illegally and it is not the question involved in this suit and defendant has not seeks the counter claim against the plaintiff’s claim. It is also evident on perusal of the record the defendant has taken several adjournments from the day of commencement of cross examination of the PW1 and also filed one or other applications and finally he came up with this application for amend the written statement. This attitude of the defendant is shows that, it is only to drag the matter, he is not interest to disposal of the suit he has preferred this application. In this stage I relied on these citations of the Hon’ble Supreme Court.
