Smt Puttamma v. the State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners sought to quash a preliminary notification regarding land acquisition that was abandoned by the respondent authority. The court held that the abandonment constituted termination of proceedings and set aside the notification relating to petitioners' land.
What did the court decide?
The preliminary notification dated 28.11.1996 is set aside insofar as it relates to the lands of the petitioners.
What the court decided
- 1 -
NC: 2024:KHC:1619 WP No. 12530 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
WRIT PETITION NO. 12530 OF 2022 (LA-UDA)
BETWEEN:
- SMT. PUTTAMMA, W/O LATE JAWARE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
- SMT. ERAMMA, W/O LINGE GOWDA @ BAPURI GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
- SRI. SHIVALINGE GOWDA, S/O NINGE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
Digitally signed by H K HEMA Location: High Court of Karnataka
ALL ARE R/AT BANDIPALYA VILLAGE,
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the preliminary notification in land acquisition proceedings should be set aside where the acquision proceedings were abandoned.
Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to quash a preliminary notification under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SMT. PUTTAMMA
- petitioner
SMT. ERAMMA
- petitioner
SRI. SHIVALINGE GOWDA
- respondent
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
- respondent
THE MYSORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/12530/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court