Writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 seeking quashing of an order. High Court dismissed the petition on preliminary hearing as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
WRIT PETITION NO.116281 OF 2019 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
SMT. RADHA W/O. SUDHAKAR GAONKAR AGED ABOUT: 67 YEARS, OCC: RETIRED TEACHER, R/O: HOSKERI, POST: SHATAGERI, NEAR BILIGIRI TEMPLE, TQ: ANKOLA, DIST: UTTARA KANNADA-581 314.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. NARAYAN V. YAJI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SAROJA HANGARAKI
Location: HIGH COURT OF KARANTAKA DHARWAD BENCH
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. VISHWANATHA K. BHAT, ADVOCATE FOR R2; NOTICE TO R1 IS SERVED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO, ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI AND QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC, ANKOLA IN O.S.NO.83/2015 DATED 20.11.2019 ON I.A.NO.12 VIDE ANNEXUREH TO THE WRIT PETITION AS IT IS ILLEGAL AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH)
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo stating that writ petition has become infructuous. Hence, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/(H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
SSP
List No.: 2 Sl No.: 5
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SMS Radha W/O. Sudhakara Gaonkar
Smt. Premabai W/O. Mukunda Nayaka
Devaraya Venkanna Nayaka
H.P. SANDESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
