L R Chandrashekar v. Sakamma
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition was dismissed because the petitioner failed to appear or file any representation despite being listed for dismissal.
What the court decided
- 1 -
NC: 2024:KHC:26145 WP No. 11504 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JULY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 11504 OF 2018 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
L.R.CHANDRASHEKAR S/O L.A. RAMAKRISHNASETTY, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT GANDHIPET, HULLIYAR, CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLY, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 214
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. K.S.RAMASWAMY IYENGAR, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)
AND:
Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
L.R.CHANDRASHEKAR
- respondent
SAKAMMA
Coram
LALITHA KANNEGANTI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/11504/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court