A writ petition challenging an order on IA No.VII in a civil suit in Mandya was withdrawn by counsel after argument; the High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn without deciding any substantive question.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 11432 OF 2024 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
ABDUL RAHIM SON OF MOHAMMED GHOSH AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, AND RESIDING AT ZAS MANZIL, NO.873, I CROSS, TIPPU ROAD, SAFDARIYABAD MOHALLA, GUTHAL ROAD, MANDYA-571 401.
…PETITIONER (BY SRI. ABHINAY Y.T., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
D. KRISHNA SON OF LATE DEVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, AND RESIDING AT NO.659, OPPOSITE JAYALAKSHMI SAW MILL, GUTHAL COLONY, II CROSS, MANDYA-571 401.
…RESPONDENT
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 13TH OF OCTOBER 2023 PASSED ON IA NO. VII IN OS NO.19 OF 2021 BY THE LEARNED PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, MANDYA (ANNEXURE-F) AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW IA NO.VII.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing the petition at length, sought permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition.
Hence, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
(R. NATARAJ) JUDGE
PMR
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 49
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Abdul Rahim
D. Krishna
R. Nataraj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
