Writ petition challenging an auction notice and recovery proceedings as barred by limitation; counsel reported the matter was settled between the parties, rendering the petition infructuous. The court dismissed the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC-D:14982 WP No. 113600 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
WRIT PETITION NO.113600 OF 2015 (CS-DAS)
BETWEEN:
BAIJU S/O. CHANDRU GAVALI, AGE: 60 YEARS, OCC: MILK VENDOR, R/O: CTS NO.1878 RANADE ROAD, BELAGAVI.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI GIRISH BHAT, ADVOCATE FOR SRI S. S. YADRAMI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
…RESPONDENTS
Digitally signed by YASHAVANT NARAYANKAR Location: High Court of Karnataka
(BY SRI SHIVAPRABHU HIREMATH, AGA FOR R2; NOTICE TO R1 IS SERVED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO, ISSUE A WRIT OR AN ORDER OR AN APPROPRIATE DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE IMPUGNED AUCTION NOTICE DATED 23.09.2014 BEARING NO.484/13.03.2021 AWARD NO.AR9/ABN/DDS/556/99-2000/25.01.2005 DATED 23.09.2014 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2, AS ILLEGAL, INSOFAR IT RELEATES TO THE PETITIONER AND HIS PROPERTY BEARING C.T.S NO.1878, MUN, H.NO.215/14 RANADE ROAD, SHAHAPUR, BELAGAVI VIDE ANNEXURE B. ISSUE A WRIT OR ORDER OR APPROPRIATE DIRECTION IN THE NTARUE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE IMPUGNED RECOVERY PROCEDDINGS PURSUANT OT VIDE ANNEXURE – B BY THE RESPONDENTS AS BARRED BY LIMITATION AND ETC.,
NC: 2024:KHC-D:14982 WP No. 113600 of 2015
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING - B GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA)
Learned counsel Sri.Girish Bhat submits that the matter
has been settled between the parties and hence, the writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
In view of the aforementioned, the above writ petition is
dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
Sd/(C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE
PMP CT-ASC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 55
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Baiju S/o Chandru Gavali
Shri Tukaram Co-operative Bank Ltd., Shahapur, Belagavi by its Manager
Asst. Registrar of Co-operative Societies and Recovery Officer (Under Rule 44), Karnataka State Federation of Urban Co-operative Banks, Bengaluru
C.M. Poonacha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
