The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous after noting that the main matter (MC No. 3414/2015) had been withdrawn by the petitioner.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 11034 OF 2019 (GM-FC)
BETWEEN:
MR. M. MEHTA MAHESH, S/O MANSUKHLAL, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, NO.7-10, A 9, KLETUL BUILDING, CHIBRAYA LAYOUT, KUMARA KRUPA ROAD, OPP CHITRAKALA PARISHATH, BANGALORE - 01. (SENIOR CITIZENSHIP NOT CLAIMED.)
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. S. B. TOTAD., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by MRS. JAYASHREE CHANDRAKANT, SUVARNA T D/O PARESH CHANDRAKANT, Location: AGEDA BOUT 55 YEARS, HIGH NO.502, SHILP APARTMENT, COURT OF ABOVE PATEL TRAVELS, KARNATAKA NEXT TO GURUDWARA CROSS ROAD, JAMNAGAR-361 001, GUJARATH STATE.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. B.M.HALASWAMY., ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE VI ADDITIONAL PRL
NC: 2024:KHC:20781 WP No. 11034 of 2019
JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BANGALORE ON IA IV IN M.C.NO.3414/2015, DATED 15.11.2018 PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE - E AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo stating that the main M.C.3414/2015 has been withdrawn by the petitioner. Hence, the Writ Petition has become infructuous. Memo is taken on record.
SD/JUDGE
BN
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23
MR. M. MEHTA MAHESH
MRS. JAYASHREE CHANDRAKANT
LALITHA KANNEGANTI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
