Writ petition challenging a mutation entry and Tahasildar's order was dismissed as the petitioner had died and court notice returned unserved; no representation appeared.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC-D:6306 WP No. 107995 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M.G.UMA
WRIT PETITION NO. 107995 OF 2017 (KLR-RR/SUR)
BETWEEN:
RANGAPPA S/O. GOVINDAPPA JALIKATTI, AGE: 87 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: YARAGOPPA, TQ: BADAMI, DIST: BAGALKOT.
… PETITIONER
(RANGAPPA G. JALIKATTI, DIED)
AND:
(BY SRI. P.N. HATTI, HCGP)
Digitally signed by MANJANNA E Location: High Court of Karnataka
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICELS 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI TO QUASH THE M.E.NO.2461 DATED 25.01.1991 CERTIFIED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE-D AND THE ORDER DATED 30.12.2014 IN NO/KLR/CR/1170/2014-15 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 VIDE ANNEXURE-F AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent and there is no
representation.
As per order dated 04.01.2024, the name of Sri.Subhash B. Sankad, learned counsel who was representing the petitioner was ordered to be deleted and the Court notice was issued to the petitioner.
As per the endorsement by process mahazer the notice issued to the petitioner returned unserved as the petitioner is dead. Copy of the death certificate is also enclosed. Hence, petition is dismissed.
SD/JUDGE
AC CT:BCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 24
1 provisions across 1 enactments
RANGAPPA S/O. GOVINDAPPA JALIKATTI
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
THE TAHASILDAR BADAMI
M.G.UMA
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
