Petitioners sought withdrawal of writ petition as relief no longer survived; court dismissed the matter as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
WRIT PETITION NO. 105433 OF 2022 (EXCISE)
BETWEEN:
SUJATA SUBHASH PAMMAR
Digitally signed by SUJATA SUBHASH PAMMAR Date: 2024.01.03 12:28:48 +0530
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. V M SHEELVANT, ADVOCATE)
AND:
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.V.S.KALASURMATH, HCGP)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT ORDER OF DIRECTION AND QUASH THE ORDER BEARING NO.EXE/WP85500/2013 DATED 17/09/2022 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.3 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-D IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
NC: 2024:KHC-D:38 WP No. 105433 of 2022
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition stating that the relief sought for in this writ petition does not survive for consideration.
Memo is placed on record.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
RSH / ct: ANB List No.: 2 Sl No.: 20
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sharada Bai W/O Narayansa Baddi
Anil S/O Narayansa Baddi
Sujata Subhash Pammar
Geeta Alias Sangeeta W/O Ganapatsa Bakale
Anita W/O Premanthsa Bandage
The Excise Commissioner
Hemant ChandangoUDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
