Petitioner sought certiorari quashing an APMC committee order. The court found an alternative efficacious appeal remedy under Section 74(1)(a) of the Karnataka APMC Act, reserved liberty to pursue it, granted benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
WRIT PETITION NO. 105187 OF 2015 (APMC)
BETWEEN:
MANJUNATH ENTERPRISES R/BY ITS PROP. GEETA ASHOK CHAVADI, VIDYAGIRI, BAGALKOT
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. GIRISH S HIREMATH.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT AND MARKETING COMMITTEE BAGALKOT REP. BY ITS SECRETARY.
YASHAVANT NARAYANKAR Digitally signed byYASHAVANT NARAYANKAR Date: 2024.02.14 13:38:00 +0530
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. C.S. PATIL., ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI BY QUASHING THE ORDER IN REF NO. SUM.KRU.U.MA.SA/BA/1547/11-12 DATED 26.11.2011 AT ANNEXURE-F AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
NC: 2024:KHC-D:3048 WP No. 105187 of 2015
ORDER
Sd/JUDGE
LN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 62
1 issue framed by the court
Should the writ petition be entertained when an alternative appeal remedy exists under Section 74(1)(a) of the APMC Act?
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Manjunath Enterprises r/by its prop. Geeta Ashok Chavadi, Vidyagiri, Bagalkot
The Agricultural Product and Marketing Committee Bagalkot rep. by its Secretary
Suraj Govindaraj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
