Allowed

S.R.Patil Social Club (R) v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC24 Oct 2024WP/105119/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court issued writ to prevent police from demanding licenses for non-gambling sports activities like carrom or chess. The court directed police to monitor for unlawful acts but not interfere with lawful club operations, setting guidelines for CCTV and member ID issuance.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondents not to interfere with lawful sports activities; issued guidelines for CCTV, identity cards, and prohibition of games of chance.

S.R.Patil Social Club (R) Vs the State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Karnataka HC (2024)

¶1

1 - NC: 2024:KHC-D:15442 WP No. 105119 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

¶3

DHARWAD BENCH

¶4

DATED THIS THE 24^TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR WRIT PETITION NO. 105119 OF 2024 (GM-POLICE)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

S.R. PATIL SOCIAL CLUB (R), SY.NO.170/1+2+3/3D, GALAGALI, NOW AT S.Y.NO.16/4, TQ: BILAGI, DIST: BAGALKOT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, SHRI MALLANAGOUDA, S/O. RANGAPPA PATIL, AGE: 27 YEARS, OCC: SECRETARY, R/O. NAGARAL, TQ: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT-587313.

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI. KIRANKUMAR CHATTIMATH, ADV. & SRI. ARVIND D. KULKARNI, ADV.)

¶11

MALLIKARJUN RUDRAYYA KALMATH Digitally signed by MALLIKARJUN RUDRAYYA KALMATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH

¶12

AND:

¶13

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED ITS SECRETARY TO HOME DEPARTMENT, VIDHANASOUDHA, BENGALURU-01.

¶14

THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, NRUPATUNGA ROAD, BESIDE RBI, NUNEGUNDALAPALLI, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-01.

¶15

THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, SUBHASH NAGAR, BELAGAVI-590001.

¶16

2 - NC: 2024:KHC-D:15442 WP No. 105119 of 2024

¶17

THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BAGALKOT-587103.

¶18

THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BAGALKOT-587103.

¶19

THE CIRCLE POLICE INSPECTOR, BILAGI, DIST: BAGALKOT-587116.

¶20

THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BILAGI POLICE STATION, DIST: BAGALKOT-587117.

¶21

…RESPONDENTS

¶22

(BY SRI. U.G. KATTIMANI, HCGP)

¶23

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING

¶24

A. TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.2 TO 7 NOT TO INTERFERE IN THE DAYTO-DAY ACTIVITIES OF THE PETITIONER SOCIAL CLUB, SITUATED AT SY.NO.170/1+2+3/3D, GALAGALI NOW AT SY.NO.16/4, TQ: BILAGI, DIST: BAGALKOT.

¶25

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶26

3 - NC: 2024:KHC-D:15442 WP No. 105119 of 2024

¶27

ORAL ORDER

¶28

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR)

¶29

Learned HCGP is directed to take notice for respondents No.1 to 7.

¶30

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned HCGP representing the respondents.

¶31

This petition is filed by the petitioner seeking writ of mandamus by way of directions to the respondents not to insist upon the petitioner to obtain license for playing skill games indoor games like Chess, Carrom, Rummy, Table Tennis, Lawn tennis, Billiards, Badminton and outdoor games such as Tennis, Tenniqutte, Athletics, Cricket etc., and further direction to respondents not to interfere in the day-to-day affairs of the petitioner club.

¶32

Petitioner is a social club under the name of S.R.Patil Social Club, registered under the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960 vide registration No.DRBK/SOR/829/2022-2023 dated 30.12.2022.

¶33

4 - NC: 2024:KHC-D:15442 WP No. 105119 of 2024

¶34

Petitioner is running several sports activities to adults, children and other members of the Club to train the members exclusively for sports. It is the grievance of the petitioner that respondent No.7 started interfering with the affairs of the petitioner and orally asking the petitioner to stop the activities. Whereas, respondents have given ultimatum and warning to close down the Club otherwise they would lock the premises for not obtaining license. Therefore, petitioner is before this Court due to the high handedness and arbitrary manner of respondent No.7 in trying to coerce the petitioner not to run the sports activities in its Club.

¶35

Learned HCGP for respondents contends that no such coercion or force has been made to the petitioner Club to obtain license and sign any documents nor interfere with the activities of the petitioner Club. He further contends that the respondents being the jurisdictional Police authorities are visiting to monitor whether any illegal or unlawful activities are being

¶36

5 - NC: 2024:KHC-D:15442 WP No. 105119 of 2024

¶37

conducted in the petitioner Club. Apart from that there is no intention of the respondents either in coercing the petitioner from obtaining the license to those activities, which are not required to be obtained by law, or in any other manner whatsoever. Hence, he contends that this petition is premature as no such order has been issued or given to the petitioner to obtain license or to shut down the premises run by the petitioner.

¶38

Learned counsel for the petitioner relies on the judgment of this Court in the case of Blue Line Video Games Associates, Bangalore Vs. State of Karnataka and others reported in (2013) 2 KLJ 177.

¶39

Admittedly, petitioner Club is registered under the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960. Having registered under the Societies Registration Act in accordance with law has been running certain activities in imparting sports activities to its members, entry is restricted to the members of the Club. The members of the Club are involved in playing games as stated above.

¶40

6 - NC: 2024:KHC-D:15442 WP No. 105119 of 2024

¶41

When the petitioner is not involved in conducting or running any unlawful, illegal activities in the Club, respondents No.2 to 7 cannot insist upon obtaining license or permission for those games and sports activities for which no license is required under law. Of course, it is necessary for the petitioner to obtain license to run any of the activities/sports for which any license is prescribed under the law.

¶42

Learned counsel has also relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Kings Social Club Handigund Vs. State of Karnataka, in W.P.NO.105936/2022 dated 16.12.2022, wherein this Court in similarly situated circumstances has issued certain guidelines to the writ petitioner therein. Admittedly, on query to the petitioner's counsel, there is no installation of CCTV camera in the Club premises and she also submits that the entry is restricted only to the members of the Club by way of issue of identity cards and persons who are not members are not permitted to enter.

¶43

7 - NC: 2024:KHC-D:15442 WP No. 105119 of 2024

¶44

Therefore, the contention of the petitioner that the respondents are insisting to obtain necessary license to run the activities belonging to the petitioner or would have to close down the Club is to be seen from the angle of whether the petitioner is running illegal and unlawful activities and if no such activities are being run by the petitioner, petitioner is entitled to run the activities in the Club without any interference for sports activities as per law.

¶45

9. The guidelines issued in paragraph No.2 of the

¶46

above said order are as under:

¶47

“(i) The petitioner shall install CC TV cameras at all the places of access to its members and also at all the places, wherein game(s) is/are played by the members within a period of six weeks. The CC TV footage of atleast prior 15 days’ period shall be made available by the petitioner to the jurisdiction police, as and when called upon to do so.

¶48

(ii) The petitioner shall issue identity card(s) to all its member(s), which shall be produced by the member(s), when called upon by the concerned police, during the raid(s), surveillance, etc.

¶49

(iii) The petitioner shall not allow any non-member(s) or the guest(s) of the member(s) to make use of its premises for the purpose of playing any kind of games or recreational activities.

¶50

(iv) The petitioner shall not permit any activity by any of its member(s), by indulging in acts of amusement, falling within the definition of Ss.2(14) & 2(15) of the Act and shall not

¶51

8 - NC: 2024:KHC-D:15442 WP No. 105119 of 2024

¶52

permit any game(s) of chance as per explanation (II) of Subsection (7) of Section 2 of Karnataka Police Act, 1963. The member(s) shall not be allowed to play any kind of game(s) with stakes or make any profit or gain out of the game(s) played.

¶53

(v) The petitioner shall put proper mechanism in place and shall ensure that no game(s) is played in any unlawful manner by the member(s). If the jurisdiction police find that the game(s) played is/are contrary to any law and in violation of the settled practice, it is open to them to take action against the petitioner and the offenders, in accordance with law.

¶54

(vi) The jurisdictional police shall have liberty to visit premises periodically and/or on receipt of any information about any unlawful activity being carried on in the petitioner’s premises.

¶55

(vii) The respondents are directed not to interfere with the lawful recreational activities carried on by the members of the petitioner’s-Club/Association.

¶56

(viii) It is made clear that this order would not come in the way of the jurisdictional police invoking the provisions of the Act and taking action in accordance with law, if the member(s) of the petitioner is/are found to have indulged in any unlawful or immoral activities.”

¶57

No order as to costs.”

¶58