Dismissed
Subhas Son of Rangappa Kolli v. the Assistant Director of
Karnataka HCWP/104771/2022
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
2024:KHC-D:13160 WP No. 104771 of 2022 IN…
What the court decided
AI extract
2024:KHC-D:13160 WP No. 104771 of 2022 IN…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC-D:13160 WP No. 104771 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 104771 OF 2022 (CS-DAS)
BETWEEN:
SUBHAS S/O RANGAPPA KOLLI, AGE: 56 YEARS, OCC: ADVOCATE, R/AT. SULIKERI VILLAGE, TQ. BADAMI, DIST. BAGALKOTI-587 201.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. PRAKASH ANDANIMATH., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. KIRTILATA.R.PATIL., HCGP FOR R1; R2-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
NC: 2024:KHC-D:13160 WP No. 104771 of 2022
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and is called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case.
Smt.Kirtilata R.Patil., HCGP for respondent No.1 has appeared in person.
As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 11.09.2024, on that day, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. Hence, the office was directed to list this matter under the caption ‘for dismissal’ on 17.09.2024.
The petition is listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. As could be seen from the petition papers, the petition is filed in the year 2022. Now we are in the month of September 2024 and it’s pending for almost two years. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested
NC: 2024:KHC-D:13160 WP No. 104771 of 2022
in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is
dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/(JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE
MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13
Subhas
The Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies
Jyoti Mulimani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court