Petitioner sought quashing of a compromise award in O.S. No. 16/2013 and restoration of the suit for trial. Counsel filed a memo stating the parties had settled amicably, and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH WRIT PETITION NO. 104643 OF 2024 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
SMT. GULSHANBANU W/O. SAMIULLA ANSARI, AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O. MASUR, TQ: HIREKERUR, DIST: HAVERI-581210.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. ANNESAHEB SHALAGAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SAROJA HANGARAKI
Location: HIGH COURT OF KARANTAKA DHARWAD BENCH
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE ORDER TO SET ASIDE THE COMPROMISE AWARD PASSED BY HON’BLE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HANGAL IN O.S. NO.16/2013 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-C
ACCORDINGLY RESTORE THE SUIT FOR FULL PLEDGED TRAIL IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH)
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed memo seeking withdrawal of the petition contending that the parties have settled the matter amicably.
Memo is taken on record.
In view of memo, petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/(H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
SMM CT-MCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Gulshanbanu w/o Samiulla Ansari
Zarinabi w/o Moualali Bhatkal
Gulam Maqbool s/o Moualali Bhatkal
Mehaboobjan s/o Moualali Bhatkal
Smt. Rahimabanu w/o Abdul Azeem Sultanpur
Smt. Parveenbanu w/o Allabaksh Surleshwar
H.P. Sandesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
