Writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging land acquisition and seeking fair compensation declared moot because petitioner's counsel submitted the petition does not survive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 - NC: 2024:KHC-D:6002 WP No. 104178 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF APRIL, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M.G.UMA
WRIT PETITION NO.104178/2016(LA-RES)
BETWEEN:
GANGADHAR @ RAMESH S/O. SANGAPPA BELERI, AGE: 53 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: HANDIGOL COMPOUNOD, NEAR HUBBALLI, TOLL NAKA, DHARWAD.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI S. S. BETURMATH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by MANJANNA E Location: High Court of Karnataka
OFFICE OF BRTS, FIRST FLOOR, KSFC BUILDING, RAYAPUR, DHARWAD.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI P.N.HATTI, HCGP FOR R1 AND R2; SRI C.V.ANGADI, ADVOCATE FOR R3 TO R6)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT, ORDER OR SPECIFIC DIRECTIONS IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 03.05.2016, VIDE ANNEXURE-E. ISSUE A WRIT, ORDER OR SPECIFIC DIRECTIONS IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO ACQUIRE THE LANDS AND PROPERTIES STRICTLY MAKE ARRANGEMENT FOR CALCULATING AND PAYMENT OF FAIR COMPENSATION, PROVIDE REHABILITATION BENEFITS AND RESETTLEMENT BENEFITS AS PER THE PROVISIONS OF “THE RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013. THAT THIS HON’BLE COURT BE PLEASED TO DECLARE THE MANNER IN WHICH THE LAND OF THE PETITIONERS ARE ATTEMPTED TO TAKEOVER BY THE RESPONDENTS AS ILLEGAL AND ALSO NOT RECOGNIZED AS ‘DUE PROCESS OF LAW’ AND NOT HAVING ANY LEGAL SANCTITY, AND ALSO DECLARE THE ACTS OF THE RESPONDENTS AS OPPRESSIVE, ARBITRARY AND MALAFIDE AND WITHOUT ANY AUTHORITY OF LAW AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING - B GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petition does not survive for consideration. Hence, the
same may be dismissed.
Submission is placed on record.
Petition is dismissed.
SD/JUDGE
AC/CT-ASC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30
GANGADHAR @ RAMESH
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
M.G.UMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
