Writ petition filed in 2022 concerning land revenue matters was dismissed for non-prosecution after the petitioners repeatedly failed to comply with office objections despite multiple opportunities, and no representation appeared when the matter was called.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC-D:12245 WP No. 103838 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI
WRIT PETITION NO. 103838 OF 2022 (KLR-RR/SUR)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VITTHAL.S.TELI., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
When the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners, either personally or through video conferencing. When the matter is listed before the Court, and is called out, the advocate must be present in the Court. His or her absence may effect the case.
As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 27.09.2022, on that day, two weeks was granted
to do the needful. Thereafter, the petition was listed on several dates and sufficient time was granted to comply with the office objections. Once again the petition was listed on 23.07.2024, on that day, a week’s time was granted to rectify the objections raised by the registry. Despite granting time, office objections were not complied with.
The petition is listed today for orders regarding noncompliance of office objections for the fifth time. A perusal of the entire order sheet reveals that despite giving sufficient opportunities, the office objections are not complied with. Furthermore, the petition is filed in the year 2022. Now we are in the month of August 2024. The petition is pending for almost two years. As already noted above, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners, either personally or through video conferencing. It appears that the petitioners are not diligent in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution and also for non-compliance of office objections.
Sd/(JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE
MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Siddappa Devappa Gasti (since died by LR's)
Kasturi Siddappa Gasti
Lakkappa Siddappa Gasti
Gouravva Siddaram Gasti
Arjun Siddappa Gasti
Nagappa Siddappa Gasti
Jyoti Mulimani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
