Nana B Jagadale v. Anantha Bhat
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Karnataka allowed a writ petition challenging the rejection of an interim injunction application. The court held that since the petitioner proved lawful possession and shown interference, the lower courts were erroneous in refusing interim relief. The writ was allowed, prior orders set aside, and an injunction granted restraining the respondent from interfering.
What did the court decide?
The writ is allowed. The impugned orders are set aside. The injunction application is allowed, restraining the respondent from interfering with the petitioner's possession.