A petitioners challenge to a notice under the Chunavane guidelines was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner did not appear before the court on the hearing date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 102715 OF 2023 (LB-RES)
BETWEEN:
KARWAR, UTTARKANNAD DISTRICT 581301
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. VENKATESH M KHARVI AND NIRMALA V DODAMANI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
YASHAVANT NARAYANKAR
Digitally signed byYASHAVANT NARAYANKAR Date: 2024.02.15 15:14:12 +0530
AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA VIDHAN SOUD, BANGALORE-560006
KINNAR , 581339
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PRAVEEN K UPPAR, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A) ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT OR ORDER IN FAVOUR OF PETITIONER BY QUASHING THE NOTICE ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO. 3 DATED 19-07-2022 UNDER CHUNAVANE VIDE ANNEXURE-E HEREIN BEING ARBITRARY, ERRONEOUS AND OPPOSED TO LAW, EQUITY, JUSTICE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
reliefs:
YAN, List No.: 2 Sl No.: 27
Sd/JUDGE
Smt. Anju W/O. Deepak Gurav
The State of Karnataka
Suraj Govindaraj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
