Dismissed
Sri Suresha v. Vs the Director of Agricultural Marketing
Karnataka HCWP/10198/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
2024:KHC:12489 WP No. 10198 of 2020 C/W WP…
What the court decided
AI extract
2024:KHC:12489 WP No. 10198 of 2020 C/W WP…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH, 2024 BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
WRIT PETITION No.10198 OF 2020 (APMC) C/W
WRIT PETITION No.4607 OF 2021 (APMC)
IN WP No.10198/2020
BETWEEN:
SRI SURESHA V., AGED 58 YEARS, PROPRIETOR, SRIDEVI INDUSTRIES, No.P-15, K. S. S. I. D. C., INDUSTRIAL AREA, HEBBALA, MYSURU-570 016.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI B. R. SATENAHALLI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by R HEMALATHA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
1 . THE DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURAL MARKETING, No.16, II RAJBHAVAN ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001.
2 . THE AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKET COMMITTEE, NANJANGUD ROAD, MYSURU-570 010, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. HEMALATHA B, AGA FOR R1; SRI T. SWAROOP, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT OF MANDAMUS TO THE RESPONDENTS TO ALLOT A SITE TO THE PETITIONER IN A-BLOCK OUT OF THE AVAILABLE 15 SITES IN A- BLOCK VIZ., SITE Nos.251, 252, 253, 256, 257, 268, 271, 273, 275, 276, 277, 180/B, 326, 323, 325 AS MENTIONED IN ANNEXURE-D IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER FORTHWITH IN ENFORCEMENT OF RULE-17 OF THE KARNATAKA AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKETING (REGULATION OF ALLOTMENT OF PROPERTY IN MARKET YARDS) RULES 2004.
IN WP No. 4607/2021
BETWEEN:
M/S SRIDEVI INDUSTRIES, No.P-15, K. S. S. I. D. C. INDUSTRIAL AREA, HEBBALA, MYSURU 570016, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR, SRI SURESHA V., AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI B. R. SATENAHALLI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY ITS SECRETARY TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COOPERATION, VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU 560001.
3 . THE AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKET COMMITTEE, MARKET YARD, BANDIPALYA, MYSORE-570025. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. HEMALATHA B, AGA FOR R1 & R2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO FOR DIRECTION OR PROHIBITION PROHIBITING IMPLEMENTING CONDITION No.7 IN THE NOTIFICATION DATED 02.02.2021 VIDE ANNEXURE-A ETC.
THESE PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the relief
sought, does not survive for consideration since the allotment proceedings have been completed.
petitioner, petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous.
allotment proceedings, if so advised, in accordance with law.
Sd/JUDGE
kcm
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petitions seeking allotment of market yard sites and prohibition of a notification became infructuous due to completion of allotment proceedings.
Sri Suresha V.
The Director of Agricultural Marketing
The Agricultural Produce Market Committee
M/s Srideri Industries (Rep. by Sri Suresha V.)
The State of Karnataka
The Director of Agricultural Marketing
Hemant ChandangoUDar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court