Muragesh S/O Gurunath Goraguddi v. the State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
2024:KHC-D:6067 WP No. 101250 of 2024 IN THE…
2024:KHC-D:6067 WP No. 101250 of 2024 IN THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 - NC: 2024:KHC-D:6067 WP No. 101250 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF APRIL, 2024 BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V.HOSMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 101250 OF 2024 (GM-POLICE)
BETWEEN:
MURAGESH S/O. GURUNATH GORAGUDDI, AGE: 36, OCC: SENIOR MANAGER, PHRDD IR CELL, KARNATAKA VIKAS GRAMEENA BANK, HEAD OFFICE, DHARWAD, ADRESS: PHRDD IR CELL, KARNATAKA VIKAS GRAMEENA BANK, HEAD OFFICE, DHARWAD-580 008.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI GIRISH V. BHAT, ADVOCATE)
AND:
CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Digitally signed byCHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2024.04.04 11:23:30 +0530
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI C. JAGADISH, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OR A DIRECTION OR AN APPROPRIATE ORDER IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE 2ND RESPONDENT AUTHORITY TO NOT TO TAKE ANY PRECIPITATIVE ACTION AGAINST MR. SATHEESHA R THE GENERAL MANAGER OF KARNATAKA VIKAS GRAMEENA BANK, HEAD OFFICE DHARWAD PURSUANT TO THE ENQUIRY NOTICE BEARING NO. ARJI/NERA/06/NAHAJANI/BELAGAVI/2024 DATED 17.02.2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-A; ISSUE A WRIT OR A DIRECTION OR AN APPROPRIATE ORDER IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE 2ND RESPONDENT AUTHORITY TO NOT TO TAKE ANY PRECIPITATIVE ACTION AGAINST MR. SOMASHEKARA NAIRY THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER OF KARNATAKA VIKAS GRAMEENA BANK, HEAD OFFICE DHARWAD PURSUANT TO THE ENQUIRY NOTICE BEARING NO. ARJI/NERA/06/NAHAJANI/BELAGAVI/2024 DATED 17.02.2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-B.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
Submission is taken on record.
In view of submission, petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
VMB List No.: 2 Sl No.: 5
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Muragesh S/o. Gurunath Goragudi
State of Karnataka
Superintendent of Police, Belagavi District
Deputy Superintendent of Police, Civil Rights Enforcement Cell
Thummapudi Satya Sindhu
Ravi V. Hosmani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court