The petitioner sought to quash an order of the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal. Upon the petitioner's application to withdraw, the Court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF APRIL, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M.G.UMA
WRIT PETITION NO.100966/2018(LR)
BETWEEN:
SRI MOHAN S/O. LAKSHAMAN RAO DESHPANDE, AGE:62 YEARS, OCC:PRIVATE SERVICE AND AGRIL., R/O: DESHPANDE ONI, HOSAYALLAPUR, DHARWAD – 580 001.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI GIRISH S. HIREMATH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by MANJANNA E Location: High Court of Karnataka
…RESPONDENTS
(R2 AND R3 ARE SERVED; R1 ACK NOT YET RECEIVED)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 29.01.2016 PASSED BY THE KARNATAKA APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU IN APPEAL
NO.201/2008 AS PER ANNEXURE – G AND ALLOW THIS PETITION AS PRAYED BY THE PETITIONER AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo
seeking permission of the Court to withdraw the petition.
Memo is placed on record.
Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
SD/JUDGE
AC/CT-ASC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be allowed or dismissed?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SRI MOHAN
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
COMPETENT OFFICER AND ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DHARWAD SUB-DIVISION
SRI KAREPPA
M.G.UMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
