Sri. H Mallu Swami @ Mallikarjun H. Anantapur v. Mr. Arun Kumar Agarwal
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to pay the process fee despite notice and grants of time.
The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to pay the process fee despite notice and grants of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC-D:11630 WP No. 100696 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V.HOSMANI
WRIT PETITION NO.100696 OF 2018 (L-RES)
BETWEEN:
AGE: MAJOR, OCC: LABOUR CONTRACTORS FOR 8 - LABOURERS, R/AT: BANKAPUR CHOWK, INDRA NAGAR, HUBBALLI – 580 028, DIST: DHARWAD.
Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: High Court of Karnataka
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI R. S. SHETTAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER OR DIRECTION QUASHING THE ORDER PASSED IN APPLICATION NO.7/2016 DATED 20.11.2017 AT ANNEXURE – N BY THE PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT, HUBBALLI AND ETC.,
THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
NC: 2024:KHC-D:11630 WP No. 100696 of 2018
ORAL ORDER
Matter is listed for further orders regarding nonpayment of process fee. It is seen that writ petition was filed on 29.01.2018. Notice was ordered on 13.11.2019. Despite same, process fee was not paid. When matter was listed for further orders on 05.08.2024, week’s time was granted finally. Till date, needful is not done. There is no appearance. This would indicate that petitioner is not diligent in pursuing writ petition. Hence, it is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/(RAVI V.HOSMANI) JUDGE
CLK CT-ASC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is diligent in pursuing the writ petition?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
H. Mallu Swami @ Mallikarjun H. Anantapur
Kiran S/o. Gururaj Acharya
Mr. Arun Kumar Agarwal
Mr. Prateek
Mr. Rastogi
Mr. Ramesh
Ravi V. Hosmani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court