Writ petition under Articles 226/227 challenging an interlocutory order in a pending suit was dismissed after petitioners filed a memo stating it had become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC-D:6305 WP No. 100600 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL, 2024 BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M.G.UMA WRIT PETITION NO. 100600 OF 2023 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
SINCE DECEASED BY LR’S
… PETITIONERS
CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Date: 2024.04.10 15:21:19 +0530
(BY SRI. PUNEET I. BADIGER, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. LAXMAN T. MANTAGANI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
MOHANSA S/O NAGUSA CHAWAN, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, OCC. HOTEL BUSINESS, NAVANAGAR, 5TH WARD, GAJENDRAGAD, TQ. RON, DIST. GADAG, PIN CODE-582114.
… RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. RAJASHEKHAR B. HALLI, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICELS 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED: 21/01/2023 PASSED BY THE COURT OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, RON IN O.S. NO.52/2010 VIDE ANNEXURE-G.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners filed a memo seeking permission of the court to dispose of the writ petition, as the same rendered infructuous.
Memo is placed on record.
The writ petition is dismissed as having become
infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
MBS CT:BCK List No.: 2 Sl No.: 8
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Narayansa s/o Takkusa Raibagi (since deceased, by LRs: Prabhavathi, Manohar, Govind, Savitribhai)
Mohansa s/o Nagusa Chawan
M.G. Uma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
