The petitioner's counsel submitted that the writ petition challenging an order of the Senior Civil Judge had become infructuous. The Court accepted the submission and dismissed the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC-D:8072 WP No. 100273 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024 BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 100273 OF 2018 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
SMT. SHIVAMMA W/O. NAGESH VALMIKI, AGE: 62 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE & HOUSEHOLD OF KANAKAGIRI, NOW RESIDING AT: NAGARAL, TQ & DIST: GADAG.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SURESH N. NAVALGUND, ADVOCATE)
AND:
YASHAVANT NARAYANKAR Digitally signed by YASHAVANT NARAYANKAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
R/O: KANAKAGIRI.
V/O DATED 26/10/2021 R1-R4, R11-R15, R18-R21 & R24 ARE HELD SUFFICIENT)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED:25.11.2017 PASSED BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, GANGAVATHI IN O.S.NO.24/2011 ON I.A.NO.30 FILED BY THE PETITIONER HEREIN U/O. I RULE 10 R/W. OR 6 RULE 17 AND SECTION 151 AND CPC VIDE ANNEXURE-"F" AND ALLOW IA. NO.30.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the present
petition has become infructuous.
Submission of the counsel is taken on record and the writ
petition is dismissed for having become infructuous.
In view of disposal of the petition, pending interlocutory applications, if any, do not survive for consideration and are disposed of accordingly.
Sd/JUDGE
YAN, List No.: 1 Sl No.: 73
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition has become infructuous due to the submission of the petitioner's counsel?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
SMT. SHIVAMMA W/O. NAGESH VALMIKI
SRI. NAGESH S/O SANNABASAPPA VALMIKI SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS
SRI. NAGARAJ S/O. NAGESH VALMIKI
SRI. NAGARJUN S/O. NAGESH VALMIKI
YASHAVANT NARAYANKAR
SMT. NAGARATNA D/O. NAGESH VALMIKI
SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
