In a writ appeal filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, the appellant sought to withdraw the appeal pending before the Court.
Writ appeal No. 1051 of 2022 dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:25877-DB WA No. 1051 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JULY, 2024
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V KAMESWAR RAO
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C M JOSHI WRIT APPEAL NO. 1051 OF 2022 (LA-KIADB)
BETWEEN:
MR. K N HARIKUMAR, S/O LATE K A NETTAKALLAPPA, REGISTERED PROPRIETOR OF M/S MULTI UTILITY LOGISTICS CENTER, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, NO.22, 1ST A MAIN, 1ST BLOCK, RMV 2ND STAGE, BANGALORE-560 094.
…APPELLANT
(BY MS. MEDINI RAO FOR HOLLA ASSOCIATES, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by NANDINI R Location: High Court of Karnataka
BANGALORE-560 002.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI P V CHANDRASHEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-1 & 2)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 24/06/2022 PASSED IN WP NO.21454/2021.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, V KAMESWAR RAO J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant by stating that in
view of the order of the learned Single Judge, the appellant shall approach the Court of Senior Civil Judge
and JMFC at Devanahalli in LAC.No.13/2014 wishes to
withdraw the appeal.
NC: 2024:KHC:25877-DB WA No. 1051 of 2022
dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of dismissal of main appeal as withdrawn, pending applications have become infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
NR/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22
K N HARIKUMAR
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITON OFFICER
MR. KRISHNAPPA
MR. GIRISH B R
V KAMESWAR RAO
C M JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
