Rame Gowda v. Eregowda
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court of Karnataka dismissed Regular Second Appeal No. 917 of 2017 for non-prosecution as the appellant and counsel did not appear on the last date of hearing or on the current date.
What did the court decide?
The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
- 1 - NC: 2024:KHC:31954 RSA No. 917 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 917 OF 2017 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
RAME GOWDA, S/O SRI JAVAREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, KODIHALLY VILLAGE, DUDDA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK – 573 118.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. DEVARAJU K.L., ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
- EREGOWDA,
S/O SRI. JAVAREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second appeal filed under Section 100 of CPC can be dismissed in the absence of the appellant.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Rame Gowda
- respondent
Eregowda
- respondent
KrishNEGOWDA
- respondent
Dyavamma
- respondent
Bhaga
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- RSA/917/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court