Regular second appeal under Section 100 CPC against decrees in a property suit was dismissed for non-prosecution as counsel was absent and costs imposed by an earlier order dated 18.01.2024 were not paid.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 880 OF 2020
BETWEEN:
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI MOHAN P.S., &
SMT. NISMALA JAYARAM, ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENTS
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, PRAYING TO SET-ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 17.07.2013, PASSED BY THE LEARNED SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ARKALGUD IN O.S.NO.216/2008 AND ALSO SET-ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 14.03.2017, IN R.A.NO.254/2013, PASSED BY THE LEARNED 5TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, HASSAN.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant is absent and also not paid the cost.
In view of non-compliance of the order dated 18.01.2024, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
ST List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri B.S.Kendagangappa
Sri B.S. Devaraja
Sri B.S. Balachandramurthy
Smt. Dakshayini
Smt. Nagarathna
Smt. Annapoorna
H.P.Sandesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
