Smt. Ganapu Hengsu v. Smt. Kamala Devadagithi
Case brief
What is this about?
Regular second appeal dismissed as abated due to rejection of condonation of delay application, without substantive consideration.
Regular second appeal dismissed as abated due to rejection of condonation of delay application, without substantive consideration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 855 OF 2014 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court Of Karnataka
APPELLANT NO.1 IS THE WIDOW AND APPELLANTS NO.2 TO 12 ARE CHILDREN OF LATE S/O MR.MARLA DEVADIGA, AND ARE ALL AGRICULTURISTS AND R/O MARAVANTHE VILLAGE AND POST KUNDAPURA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT-570 076.
…APPELLANTS
AND:
BOTH ARE R/A KOMBINA MANE, POST: MARAVANTHE VILLAGE - 576 224, KUNDAPURA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT.
D/O SMT.LAKSHMI DEVADAGITHI,
RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 24 ARE R/O MARAVANTHE VILLAGE AND POST, KUNDAPURA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT.
…RESPONDENTS
[BY SRI REVANNA BELLARY, ADVOCATE FOR R1 - R4 & PROPOSED R11(a) & R11(b) (PH); SMT. BUDRUNNISA, ADV FOR R7, R12-R17; V/O/D 06.06.2024-APPEAL IN R/O R5, R11 & R21 ARE DISMISSED AS ABATED; R6, R8, R9, R10, R18 - R20, R22 - R25 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED]
THIS RSA IS FILED U/S 100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 19.11.2012 PASSED IN R.A.NO.102/2005 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, KUNDAPURA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 16.093.2005 PASSED IN O.S.NO.371/1996 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (JR. DN), KUNDAPURA.
THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR HEARING ON I.A ., THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
ORAL JUDGMENT
In view of rejection of I.A.no.1/2016 for condonation of
delay, appeal does not survive for consideration.
Consequently, it is dismissed .
Sd/-
(RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE
AV
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10
Smt. Ganapu Hengsu
Smt. SusHEELa
Smt. Shobha
Smt. Sukanya
Smt. Girija
Appellants No. 6-12
Ravi V Hosmani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court