the respective parties, it is not in dispute with regard to the fact that the plaintiff had purchased total extent of 4 acres 35 guntas as per registered sale deed dated 14.10.1971, 22.06.1969 and 12.07.1967. On the other hand, the plaintiffs have sold 3 acres 33 guntas to defendant No.5 as per registered sale deed dated 27.10.2006. In the background of this aspect, whether the plaintiffs have to be declared as owner of the retained portion of 1 acre 2 guntas or not is to be looked into in this appeal. In this regard, on perusal of the finding recorded by the Trial Court makes it clear that, as the plaintiffs have not disclosed the real facts in the pleadings on record, as well as the defendants are none other than the legal representatives of vendors of the plaintiffs and in this regard, the question relating to the left out portion of 9 guntas belonging to the defendants, as the plaintiffs have not disclosed that the defendants as their vendors in the pleadings on record and that apart, the Trial Court having taken note of the fact that the plaintiffs were
