Regular Second Appeal by rightful heirs challenging a partition decree was rejected as the appellants failed to appear despite three calls, despite counsel readiness by the respondent.
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 756 OF 2015 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
SMT CHIKKANARAYANAMMA, SINCE DECEASED BY HER LRS
Digitally signed by NARAYANAPPA LAKSHMAMMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS
CHICKBALLAPURA TALUK 562101
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. K.K. VASANTH, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. S.K. NAGARATHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R1; R2 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS RSA IS FILED U/S. 100 (1) OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 20.02.2015 PASSED IN RA NO. 43/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. DISTRICT JUDGE, CHIKKABALLAPUR, DISMISSED AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 17.07.2010 PASSED IN OS NO. 26/1995 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.) CJM, CHICKBALLAPUR.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Sd/JUDGE
NG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23 CT:SNN
SRI. MUNIRAJU AND OTHERS
SRI. NARENDRA BABU
SRI. CHIKKA ASHWATHAGOWDA
SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
