Second appeal against a first appellate decree in a partition matter. No counsel appeared on the date of hearing or earlier dates; appellants showed no diligence prosecuting the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 671 OF 2011 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka
APPELLANTS NO.1 TO 4 ARE ALL AGRICULTURISTS, R/O SURANAHALLY, PARASHURAMPURA HOBLI, CHALLAKERE TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 522.
…APPELLANTS
[V/O DATED 7.12.2014, APPEAL ABATES AS AGIANST A1; SMT. SARITHA M., ADVOCATE FOR A2, A3 & A4 (ABSENT); V/O DTD. 31.7.2023, APPEAL AGAINST A-1(d) IS ABATED; PROPOSED LRs OF DECEASED APPELLANT A1(a)-(c), A1(e)-(g) ARE SERVED-I.As.No.1 TO 4 OF 2015 ARE PENDING]
NC: 2024:KHC:42599 RSA No. 671 of 2011
AND:
RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 6 ARE ALL R/O PARASHURAMAPURA HOBLI, CHALLAKERE TALUK.
RESPONDENTS NO.7 TO 9 ALL ARE AGRICULTURISTS, R/O SURANAHALLY, PARASHURAMPURAHOBLI,
NC: 2024:KHC:42599 RSA No. 671 of 2011
CHALLAKERE TALUK,
CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 522.
…RESPONDENTS
[BY SRI B.J.VEERENDRA KUMAR, ADV. FOR R3 (ABSENT); R1, R2, R4 TO R9 ARE SERVED]
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 16.12.2010 PASSED IN R.A.NO.16/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE (FAST TRACK COURT), CHITRADURGA, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 19.12.2009 PASSED IN O.S.NO.41/2006 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.), CHALLAKERE.
THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION , THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
ORAL JUDGMENT
None appears for appellants. Perusal of order sheet
would indicate that even on previous dates of hearing, there was no representation. This would indicate that appellants are not diligent in prosecuting appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/(RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE
AV
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33
1 provisions across 1 enactments
G.S. BHANDE RUDRAPPA
ESHWARAPPA
JAYANNA
PUTANNA
VEERAMMA
BHEEMAPPA
RAVI V HOSMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
