Second appeal in a partition suit was disposed of on a memo filed by the appellants stating that the parties had settled their dispute through a registered partition deed dated 17.05.2022.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:13530 RSA No. 668 of 2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF APRIL, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.668 OF 2010 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
KALLAPPA S/O MADAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE
Digitally signed by SHARANYA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
ALL ARE R/A ARABAGATTA RAMAGIRI HOBLI HOLALKERE TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT
1(D) SMT. SUJATHA D/O LATE KALLAPPA W/O RAJU AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS TEACHER CHIKKAYAGATI HOSADURGA TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI S C VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
S/O MADAPPA SINCE DECEASED
W/O LATE M MURTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS HOUSEHOLD WORK
D/O LATE M MURTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 6 YEARS
MINOR R/BY THEIR NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHERYESHODAMMA R/O ARABAGATTA, ARAMAGIRI HOBLIHOLALKERE TQ, CHITRADURGA DIST
S/O LATE M MURTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 5 YEARS
SINCE (B) AND (C) ARE MINOR REP. BY THEIR NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER -YESHODAMMA
R/O ARABAGATTA ARAMAGIRI HOBLI HOLALKERE TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT
A) CHOWDAMMA W/O LATE MADAPPA AGED 73 YEARS R/A ARABAGATTA RAMAGIRI HOBLI HOLALKERE TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT
B) RUDRAMMA W/O HANUMANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS HOUSEHOLD WORK
W/O ESHWARAPPA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS HOUSEHOLD WORK
NC: 2024:KHC:13530 RSA No. 668 of 2010
RESPONDENTS (B) TO (D) ARE R/O ARASANA GATTA, TARIKERE TALUK CHIKKAMAGALUR DISTRICT
BOTH ARE R/O ARABAGHATTA RAMAGIRI HOBLI HOLALKERE TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI D R NAGARAJA, ADVOCATE FOR R3(A-D); SRI NAGAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R1(A-C) R2; R1(B & C) ARE MINORS, REP. BY R1(A); R4 & R5 ARE SERVED)
THIS RSA IS FILED U/S 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 05.01.2010 PASSED IN R.A.14/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE, (SR. DN.), HOLALKERE AND ETC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
NC: 2024:KHC:13530 RSA No. 668 of 2010
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel appearing for the appellants has filed a memo along with the copy of the registered partition deed and prays for disposal of the appeal since the parties have entered into the partition deed dated 17.05.2022. In view of the said memo, the appeal is disposed of.
Sd/JUDGE
SN
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kallappa s/o Madappa since deceased by his legal representatives (Eramma, K Girijamma, K Veerabhadrappa, Sujatha)
M Murthappa since deceased by his legal representatives (Yeshodamma, Kavya, Prakash)
M Rajappa
Madappa s/o Kallappa since deceased by his LRS (Chowdamma, Rudramma, Onkaramma, Paramma)
Eshwarappa
K Basavarajappa
H.P. Sandesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
