The High Court of Karnataka disposed of Regular Second Appeal No. 483 of 2012. Counsel for the appellant sought that the rights be proceeded before the Assistant Commissioner before deciding the appeal. The court allowed this submission and disposed of the appeal.
The appeal was disposed of while allowing time for proceedings before the Assistant Commissioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:20210 RSA No. 483 of 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.483 OF 2012 (INJ)
BETWEEN:
SMT PUTTAMMA W/O. LATE GANGAIAH AGE: 58 YEARS R/O C. HARIVESANDRA VILLAGE CHELUR HOBLI GUBBI TALUK-572 216.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI CHANDRAKANTH R. GOULAY, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by R MANJUNATHA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
ALL ARE MAJOR, RESIDENT OF C. HARIVESANDRA VILLAGE CHELUR HOBLI GUBBI TALUK-572 216.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS RSA FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 07.12.2011 PASSED IN R.A.NO.57/2006 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, GUBBI, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED: 15.6.2006 PASSED IN O.S.NO.22/1997 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN), GUBBI.
NC: 2024:KHC:20210 RSA No. 483 of 2012
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Sri Chandrakant R Goulay, learned counsel for the appellant submits that the suit for injunction filed by the plaintiff came to be dismissed and against which appeal filed for divergent findings. The matters are pending before the learned Assistant Commissioner.
Sri Chandrakant R Goulay submits that the rights of the appellant may be directed to be worked out before the Assistant Commissioner and Regular Second Appeal may be disposed of.
Placing the said submission on record, Regular Second Appeal stands disposed of.
Sd/JUDGE
MR
List No.: 2 Sl No.: 9
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the suit regarding rights should be determined before the Assistant Commissioner before disposing of the Regular Second Appeal.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SMT PUTTAMMA W/O. LATE GANGAIAH
SRI H. R. NATARAJU S/O. H. M. RAJAMALLAPPA
SRI PARAMASHIVAIAH S/O. MALLAIAH
SRI SHIVANANJAIAH S/O. NANJUNDAIAH
SRI SHIVALINGAIAH S/O. MUNIGANGAIAH
SRI DODDASIDDAIAH S/O. NARASIMHAIAH
V SRISHANANDA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
