Smt H Manjula v. Smt Uma Sridhar
Case brief
What is this about?
Appendix order granting two weeks time to appellants for compliance of office objections in a regular second appeal, with a proviso for dismissal if not paid.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JULY 2024
BEFORE
THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 249 OF 2022
BETWEEN
- 1 . SMT. H MANJULA
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
W/O H NARASIMHAREDDY NO. 759 BEHIND PRAVEEN TEA STALL & SRIGOWRI CEMENTS
UTTANAHALLI ROAD
NEAR HOSA HUNDI GATE BUS STAND HOSA HUNID KASABA HOBLI MYSURU TALUK 570010
- 2 . SRI H NARASIMHAREDDY
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Smt. H Manjula & anr.
- respondent
Smt. Uma Sridhar
Coram
H.P. Sandesh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- RSA/249/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court