P. C. Ramalingappa v. Vijaya @ Viji
Case brief
What is this about?
Regular second appeal filed under Section 100 CPC challenging a first appellate decree. The sole appellant had died and no steps were taken to bring his legal representatives on record, so the appeal stood abated.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 - NC: 2024:KHC:37722 RSA No. 2052 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 2052 OF 2017
BETWEEN:
P. C. RAMALINGAPPA, S/O. LATE P. D. CHIKKANNA, AGED ABOUT 83 YEARS, R/AT NEHARU ROAD, PERIYAPATNA TOWN, MYSORE 571 107.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. SRIDHAR R., ADVOCATE)
AND:
VIJAYA @ VIJI S/O. SHIVAMALLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT NEHARU ROAD, PERIYAPATNA TOWN, MYSORE 571 107.
Digitally signed by MAHALAKSHMI B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
Parties & counsel
- appellant
P. C. Ramalingappa
- respondent
Vijaya @ Viji
Coram
K.S. Hemalekha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- RSA/2052/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court