Regular second appeal under Section 100 CPC against a modified first appellate decree in a partition matter was withdrawn after the parties settled and appellants executed a registered relinquishment deed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1915 OF 2016 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. BYREGOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR SMT.SUDHA S N., ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by MAHALAKSHMI B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
AND:
D/O NARAYANASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS,
ALL ARE R/AT HULIBELE VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, BANGARPET TALUK – 563 114.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. S VISWESWARAIAH., ADVOCATE FOR C/R1, R3 TO R5)
THIS RSA IS FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 18.07.2016 PASSED IN R.A.NO. 67/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & PRL., J.M.F.C., K.G.F, PARTLY ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND MODIFYING JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 28.07.2015 PASSED IN OS NO.107/2004 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC, AT BANGARPET.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellants submits that he
does not intend to press the appeal and has filed a memo
seeking to withdraw the appeal.
The appellants submits as follows;
Nos.1 and 2 and the learned counsel for the appellants.
is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/(K.S. HEMALEKHA) JUDGE
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5/YKL
1 provisions across 1 enactments
N. Prakash
N. Nandish
Narayanaswamy
Jayamma
Kumar
Jyothi
K.S. Hemalekha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
