Girija v. Shivamma
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed appeals filed under Section 100 of CPC against a decree in a suit for possession. The court held that since steps were not taken by the remaining respondents, the continuation of the appeals was not tenable.
What did the court decide?
All appeals brought up for admission were dismissed on the ground that the appeals against remaining respondents were untenable due to lack of steps taken.
What the court decided
- 1 -
NC: 2024:KHC:44326 RSA No. 184 of 2011 C/W RSA No. 182 of 2011 RSA No. 183 of 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024 BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.184 OF 2011 (RES)
C/W
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.182 OF 2011 (POS)
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.183 OF 2011 (POS)
BETWEEN:
- GIRIJA, W/O LATE DHANANJAYA, AGED 83 YEARS, R/A KANHANGAD, KASARGOD DISTRICT & POST,
KERALA - 670 315.
- RATHNAVATHI,
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal against remaining respondents remains tenable when steps are not taken by them.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Girija
- appellant
Rathnavathi
- appellant
Sharada
- appellant
Kasthuri
- appellant
Madhava
- appellant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- RSA/184/2011
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court