High Court dismissed a Regular Second Appeal filed in 2018 for non-prosecution as the appellants were absent despite twice being listed before the bench in November 2024, indicating lack of interest in prosecuting.
None; appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:45510 RSA No. 1593 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1593 OF 2018 (DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka
NC: 2024:KHC:45510 RSA No. 1593 of 2018
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 READ WITH ORDER 42 RULE OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ADMISSSION, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
Though matter called twice, the appellants are not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case.
As could be seen from the appeal papers, the appeal is filed in the year 2018. Now we are in the month of November 2024. The appeal is pending from six years. As already noted above, though matter called twice, the appellants are not represented. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the Regular Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/(JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE
TKN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 12
V. Hananthappa S/o Hanumanna
V. Thippannan S/o Hanumanna
V. Ningappa S/o Hanumanna
K.N. Hananthappa S/o Nagappa
Jyoti Mulimani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
