Kale Gowda a v. Kaladurge Gowda
Case brief
What is this about?
2024:KHC:50174 RSA No. 1574 of 2021 IN THE…
2024:KHC:50174 RSA No. 1574 of 2021 IN THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1574 OF 2021 (INJ)
BETWEEN:
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT KACHUVANAHALLI VILLAGE SATHANUR HOBLI KANAKAPURA TALUK - 562 126 RAMANAGARA DISTRICT.
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI MANIVANNAN G., ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by B VEENA KUMARI
Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
AND:
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT KACHUVANAHALLI VILLAGE SATHANUR HOBLI KANAKAPURA TALUK - 562 126 RAMANAGARA DISTRICT.
RESPONDENTS
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 R/W ORDER 42 RULE 2 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 22.10.2020 PASSED IN RA.NO.5053/2019 (OLD RA NO.35/2017) ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, RAMANAGARA TO SIT AT KANAKAPURA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND UPHOLDING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 14.09.2017 PASSED IN OS NO.164/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., KANAKAPURA. TRIAL COURT DECREED THE SUIT. APPELLATE COURT DISMISSED THE APPEAL SUIT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION.
THIS RSA, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
ORAL JUDGMENT
This appeal is filed on 08.02.2021. Office has raised
the objections. The office has granted time to comply with the office objections. Despite the time granted, the appellants did not comply with the office objections.
NC: 2024:KHC:50174 RSA No. 1574 of 2021
Two weeks time was granted to comply with the office objections. The matter was listed on 28.10.2024. At the request of the learned counsel for the appellants, time was granted to take necessary steps against deceased appellant No.1. The matter was listed on 25.11.2024. None appears for the appellants. One week time is granted to file a necessary application, failing which, appeal shall be listed for dismissal. Despite granting sufficient opportunity, the appellant neither complied office objections nor filed necessary application to bring the legal representatives of deceased appellant No.1. The appeal is of the year 2021. It seems that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal.
Sd/(ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE
KLY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kale Gowda A.
Mari Gowda
Kaladurge Gowda
Kabbalu Gowda
Ashok S. Kinagi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court