Regular Second Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution as appellants were absent despite multiple listings after a four-year pendency.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:46102 RSA No. 157 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 157 OF 2020 (INJ)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka
THE APELLANTS ALL ARE RESIDING AT MAHINMANNA PALYA, VILLAGE, DASANAPURA, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, PIN CDE-562 162.
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. P.M.SIDDAMALLAPPA., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
HUDSON CIRCLE, BENGALURU-560 003.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
Though matter called twice, the appellants are not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case.
As could be seen from the appeal papers, the appeal was filed in the year 2020. Now we are in the month of November 2024. The appeal is pending from four years. As already noted above, though matter called twice, the appellants are not represented. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the Regular Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/(JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE
TKN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 58
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri Anjinappa S/o Late Dasappa
Sri. Kempaiyah S/o Late Dasappa
Sri. Venkatesh S/o Late Dasappa
Kadabageri Grama Panchayath
The Chief Executive Officer, Bengaluru Urban Zilla Panchayatha Krushi Bhavan
Jyoti Mulimani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
