The regular second appeal was dismissed due to the appellant's non-payment of court costs and failure to comply with office objections granted despite a previous time extension.
The appeal was dismissed for non-payment of cost and non-compliance of office objections.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JULY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1422 OF 2021
BETWEEN:
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. SRINIVASAN T., ADVOCATE – ABSENT)
AND:
…RESPONDENTS
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 29.02.2012 PASSED IN O.S.NO.1911/2007, ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU AND FURTHER SET ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 31.08.2019 IN R.A.NO.148/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE FIRST ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the appellant is absent. This Court vide order dated 11.01.2024, granted two weeks time to comply with the office objections subject to payment of cost of Rs.1,000/-. Inspite of the same, the cost is not paid and not complied with the office objections also.
payment of cost and non-compliance of office objections.
Sd/JUDGE
MD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 42
Sri Venkataswamy
The Secretary, Government of Karnataka
H.P. Sanderesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
