Regular second appeal in a partition suit dismissed for non-prosecution; appellants failed to engage new counsel after theirs was permitted to retire and did not appear.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1363 OF 2014 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
BOTH ARE R/A MANCHINEELLAKOTE VILLAGE, NELAVANKI HOBLI, SRINIVASAPURA TALUK.
Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court Of Karnataka
…APPELLANTS
(APPELLANTS - ABSENT)
AND:
NC: 2024:KHC:49288 RSA No. 1363 of 2014
…RESPONDENTS
KOLAR 2ND CROSS,
KOLAR DISTRICT - 572 104.
[R3(C) - SERVED]
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.06.2014 PASSED IN R.A.NO.141/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, KOLAR, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 13.08.2010 PASSED IN O.S.NO.243/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CILVIL JUDGE & JMFC., SRINIVASPUR.
THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS , THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
ORAL JUDGMENT
As per order dated 15.11.2024, learned counsel for appellants was permitted to retire. Thereafter, time was granted to appellants to make alternative arrangement.
Till date, neither steps are taken nor there is representation on behalf of appellants. This would indicate that appellants are not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/(RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE
AV
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri Tailor Narayanaswamy (dead) by his LRs
Sri Bhaskar
Sri Manjunatha
Sri Girish
Sri Krishnappa
Smt Rajamma
Ravi V Hosmani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
